Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i7-7700
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i7-7700 gets 257.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 4.2 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i7-7700 gets 257.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 4.2 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
67.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
257.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
26.7k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
23.7k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
5.46k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
11.48k (x2.97)
TOTAL
38.85k
67.33k (x1.73)
Multithread
3200U
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
115.97k (x6.77)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
108.43k (x3.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
26.28k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
6.85k (x1.67)
TOTAL
61.23k
257.52k (x4.21)
Performance/W
3200U
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
1784 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1668 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
3962 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
6356 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5643 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
2733 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
16032 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4