| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i7-7500U


Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7500U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i7-7500U gets 86.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7500U is 1.4 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
48.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
86.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
i7-7500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
20.74k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
18.41k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.98k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
5.54k (x1.43)
TOTAL
38.85k
48.67k (x1.25)

Multithread

3200U

i7-7500U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
37.34k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
35.79k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
8.34k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
5.48k (x1.34)
TOTAL
61.23k
86.94k (x1.42)

Performance/W
3200U
i7-7500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2386 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
556 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
365 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
5796 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200U
i7-7500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
5926 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5260 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1137 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1584 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
13907 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4