Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i5-8500T
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i5-8500T gets 251.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 4.1 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i5-8500T gets 251.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 4.1 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ea
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
59.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
251.82k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
23.13k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
20.7k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.71k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
10.73k (x2.77)
TOTAL
38.85k
59.27k (x1.53)
Multithread
3200U
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
125.17k (x7.31)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
98.07k (x3.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
25.57k (x2.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.01k (x0.74)
TOTAL
61.23k
251.82k (x4.11)
Performance/W
3200U
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
3576 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
731 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
7195 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
6608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
16934 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4