| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i5-8300H


Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 3 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ea
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
182.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
23.6k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
21.72k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.61k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
6.8k (x1.76)
TOTAL
38.85k
56.72k (x1.46)

Multithread

3200U

i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
79.12k (x4.62)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
81.27k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
17.46k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
4.62k (x1.13)
TOTAL
61.23k
182.47k (x2.98)

Performance/W
3200U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
4055 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4