Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
97.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
19.34k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
17.47k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.08k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
4.04k (x1.05)
TOTAL
38.85k
44.94k (x1.16)
Multithread
3200U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
42.86k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
41.3k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
9.69k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.68k (x0.9)
TOTAL
61.23k
97.52k (x1.59)
Performance/W
3200U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
6501 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4