| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i3-7100


Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 2.1 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
126.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
25.77k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
23.26k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
5.43k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
4.09k (x1.06)
TOTAL
38.85k
58.55k (x1.51)

Multithread

3200U

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
54.98k (x3.21)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
54.73k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
13.12k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.65k (x0.89)
TOTAL
61.23k
126.47k (x2.07)

Performance/W
3200U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
2480 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
6607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5964 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1393 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1049 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
15014 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4