Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i3-6100
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
112.28k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
22.89k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
21.04k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.9k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
4.01k (x1.04)
TOTAL
38.85k
52.84k (x1.36)
Multithread
3200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
50.05k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
47.13k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
11.38k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.72k (x0.91)
TOTAL
61.23k
112.28k (x1.83)
Performance/W
3200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4