| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200U vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 6.1 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f11
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
372.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
13.72k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
22.48k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
5.12k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
15.44k (x3.99)
TOTAL
38.85k
56.76k (x1.46)

Multithread

3200U

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
110.92k (x6.47)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
200.56k (x6.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
54.24k (x5.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
7.01k (x1.71)
TOTAL
61.23k
372.73k (x6.09)

Performance/W
3200U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4