| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200U vs 2200U


Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.2 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f10
Core
Picasso
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
71.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
10.73k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
18.15k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.99k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
3.89k (x1.01)
TOTAL
38.85k
36.77k (x0.95)

Multithread

3200U

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
20.11k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
36.87k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
10.74k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.31k (x0.81)
TOTAL
61.23k
71.02k (x1.16)

Performance/W
3200U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
4735 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4