Ryzen 3 3200U vs 2200G
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 2.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 2.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f10
Core
Picasso
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
13.75k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
22.58k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.99k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
3.55k (x0.92)
TOTAL
38.85k
44.87k (x1.15)
Multithread
3200U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
50.99k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
84.4k (x2.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
18.95k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.2k (x0.78)
TOTAL
61.23k
157.54k (x2.57)
Performance/W
3200U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4