Ryzen 3 3200U vs Athlon 3000G
Description
Both models 3200U and 3000G are based on Zen+ architecture.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f81
Core
Picasso
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
13.02k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
20.56k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.81k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
5.43k (x1.4)
TOTAL
38.85k
43.82k (x1.13)
Multithread
3200U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
27.29k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
49.37k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
13.57k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
5.61k (x1.37)
TOTAL
61.23k
95.84k (x1.57)
Performance/W
3200U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4