| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
50654
Core
Picasso
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
12.29k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
3.64k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
6.55k (x0.99)
TOTAL
33.79k
25.46k (x0.75)

Multithread

3200G

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
20.42k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
95.83k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
30.88k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
9.7k (x1.48)
TOTAL
108.01k
156.83k (x1.45)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
18.78k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
16.25k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
3.99k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
6.8k (x1.25)
TOTAL
49.21k
45.82k (x0.93)

Multithread

3200G

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
133.55k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
108.43k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
30.02k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
9.48k (x1.73)
TOTAL
168.69k
281.48k (x1.67)

Performance/W
3200G
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4