Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon X5670
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.4 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.4 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
206c2
Core
Picasso
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
8.35k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
5.58k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
3.32k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
3k (x0.45)
TOTAL
48k
20.26k (x0.42)
Multithread
3200G
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
49.72k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
35.19k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
21.88k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
8.6k (x1.31)
TOTAL
165.91k
115.4k (x0.7)
Performance/W
3200G
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
853 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1279 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
2552 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3574 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1354 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1650 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
12000 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4