| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon W3550


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the W3550 is based on .

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.3 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
106a5
Core
Picasso
Bloomfield
Architecture
Zen+
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
73.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
2.3k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
5.21k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
3.31k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
3.09k (x0.47)
TOTAL
33.79k
13.92k (x0.41)

Multithread

3200G

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
8.75k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
19.8k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
12.38k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
6.17k (x0.94)
TOTAL
108.01k
47.09k (x0.44)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
8.34k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
5.56k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
3.26k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
3.08k (x0.47)
TOTAL
48k
20.24k (x0.42)

Multithread

3200G

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
32.5k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
21.59k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
12.85k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
6.27k (x0.95)
TOTAL
165.91k
73.21k (x0.44)

Performance/W
3200G
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
853 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1279 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
2552 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3574 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1354 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1650 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
12000 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4