Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon W3520
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.3 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.3 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
106a5
Core
Picasso
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
7.35k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
4.89k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
2.9k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
2.82k (x0.43)
TOTAL
48k
17.96k (x0.37)
Multithread
3200G
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
29.69k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
22.26k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
14.91k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
6.29k (x0.96)
TOTAL
165.91k
73.16k (x0.44)
Performance/W
3200G
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
853 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1279 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
2552 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3574 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1354 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1650 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
12000 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4