Ryzen 3 3200G vs Pentium G3260
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.8 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.8 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
65 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
11.73k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
10.45k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
4.55k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
3.83k (x0.58)
TOTAL
48k
30.56k (x0.64)
Multithread
3200G
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
22.99k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
20.53k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
8.82k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
6.55k (x1)
TOTAL
165.91k
58.89k (x0.35)
Performance/W
3200G
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
853 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1279 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
2552 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3574 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1354 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1650 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
12000 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4