| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-7660U


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
57.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
132.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
22.46k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
19.29k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.77k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
10.94k (x2)
TOTAL
49.21k
57.46k (x1.17)

Multithread

3200G

i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
56.67k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
46.95k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
12.36k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
16.84k (x3.07)
TOTAL
168.69k
132.81k (x0.79)

Performance/W
3200G
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
3778 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
3130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
1122 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
8854 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5614 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
4823 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2735 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
14365 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4