Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-4820K
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 166.8 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 166.8 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306e4
Core
Picasso
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
11.85k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
11.84k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.69k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
4.12k (x0.56)
TOTAL
48.63k
32.49k (x0.67)
Multithread
3200G
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
47.65k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
54.81k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
21.56k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
10.05k (x1.53)
TOTAL
166.79k
134.08k (x0.8)
Performance/W
3200G
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
796 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1350 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
2566 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3262 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5719 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
12157 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4