| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-4710HQ


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-4710HQ gets 155.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
65 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
40.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
155.24k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
20.98k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
10.48k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.75k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
4.44k (x0.81)
TOTAL
49.21k
40.65k (x0.83)

Multithread

3200G

i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
77.73k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
52.12k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
20.55k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
4.85k (x0.89)
TOTAL
168.69k
155.24k (x0.92)

Performance/W
3200G
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
3303 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
2993 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
11614 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4