Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0652
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
349.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.69k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
18.71k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.84k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
13.95k (x2.11)
TOTAL
33.79k
43.19k (x1.28)
Multithread
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
18.79k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
86.1k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
27.42k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
5.27k (x0.81)
TOTAL
108.01k
137.58k (x1.27)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
16.63k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
24.17k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
6.38k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
13.69k (x2.07)
TOTAL
48k
60.87k (x1.27)
Multithread
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
67.07k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
107.95k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
27.05k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
5.07k (x0.77)
TOTAL
165.91k
207.14k (x1.25)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
16.71k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
25.45k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
6.06k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
13.2k (x1.8)
TOTAL
48.63k
61.43k (x1.26)
Multithread
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
67.59k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
111.94k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
27.7k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
5.3k (x0.81)
TOTAL
166.79k
212.53k (x1.27)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
29.06k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
26.49k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
6.23k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
13.89k (x2.54)
TOTAL
49.21k
75.67k (x1.54)
Multithread
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
154.61k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
151.34k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
36.33k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.93k (x1.26)
TOTAL
168.69k
349.21k (x2.07)
Performance/W
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
7760 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4