Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-10510U
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ec
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
190.82k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.91k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
20.01k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
6.05k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
14.16k (x2.14)
TOTAL
33.79k
45.13k (x1.34)
Multithread
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
13.79k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
70.21k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
20.05k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
8.04k (x1.23)
TOTAL
108.01k
112.09k (x1.04)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
17.66k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
25.46k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
6.4k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
14.05k (x2.13)
TOTAL
48k
63.57k (x1.32)
Multithread
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
54.45k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
84.97k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
21.26k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
8.04k (x1.22)
TOTAL
165.91k
168.72k (x1.02)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
17.52k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
26.74k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
6.22k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
13.33k (x1.82)
TOTAL
48.63k
63.81k (x1.31)
Multithread
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
54.53k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
85.61k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
20.87k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
8.05k (x1.23)
TOTAL
166.79k
169.07k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
22.85k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
21.15k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.78k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
10.24k (x1.87)
TOTAL
49.21k
59.01k (x1.2)
Multithread
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
86.08k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
79.78k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
18.26k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.69k (x1.22)
TOTAL
168.69k
190.82k (x1.13)
Performance/W
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
12721 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4