| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-9500


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 2.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ea
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
352.84k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.45k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
18.43k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.84k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
12.63k (x1.91)
TOTAL
33.79k
41.34k (x1.22)

Multithread

3200G

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
24.75k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
103.1k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
32.43k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
5.56k (x0.85)
TOTAL
108.01k
165.85k (x1.54)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
16.06k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
23.19k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
6.1k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
12.79k (x1.94)
TOTAL
48k
58.14k (x1.21)

Multithread

3200G

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
90.44k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
131.23k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
33.85k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
5.59k (x0.85)
TOTAL
165.91k
261.11k (x1.57)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
16.14k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
24.18k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.87k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
12.5k (x1.71)
TOTAL
48.63k
58.69k (x1.21)

Multithread

3200G

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
92.21k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
137.92k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
33.12k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
5.56k (x0.85)
TOTAL
166.79k
268.8k (x1.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
29.17k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
25.49k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.84k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
13.15k (x2.41)
TOTAL
49.21k
73.65k (x1.5)

Multithread

3200G

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
166.66k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
146.9k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
34.04k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
5.25k (x0.96)
TOTAL
168.69k
352.84k (x2.09)

Performance/W
3200G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4