Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ec
Core
Picasso
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
143.23k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.68k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
16.08k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.99k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
7.95k (x1.2)
TOTAL
33.79k
32.69k (x0.97)
Multithread
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
14.29k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
61.15k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
16.53k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
3.72k (x0.57)
TOTAL
108.01k
95.69k (x0.89)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.6k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
20.03k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.19k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
7.05k (x1.07)
TOTAL
48k
45.87k (x0.96)
Multithread
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
51.42k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
77.48k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
16.65k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
3.69k (x0.56)
TOTAL
165.91k
149.24k (x0.9)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
13.66k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
21.17k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
8.11k (x1.11)
TOTAL
48.63k
47.94k (x0.99)
Multithread
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
51.36k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
79.72k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
16.61k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
3.75k (x0.57)
TOTAL
166.79k
151.44k (x0.91)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
19.19k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
17.47k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.04k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
5.97k (x1.09)
TOTAL
49.21k
46.67k (x0.95)
Multithread
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
64.43k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
61.91k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
13.36k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
3.52k (x0.64)
TOTAL
168.69k
143.23k (x0.85)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
9548 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4