| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-7300HQ


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.41k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
14.14k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.41k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
8.87k (x1.34)
TOTAL
33.79k
30.83k (x0.91)

Multithread

3200G

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
12.75k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
52.88k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
16.25k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
8.98k (x1.37)
TOTAL
108.01k
90.85k (x0.84)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
11.71k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
16.74k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
4.27k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
7.81k (x1.18)
TOTAL
48k
40.53k (x0.84)

Multithread

3200G

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
44.38k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
62.55k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
15.6k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
7.85k (x1.19)
TOTAL
165.91k
130.38k (x0.79)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
11.59k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
17.89k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.14k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
7.88k (x1.08)
TOTAL
48.63k
41.5k (x0.85)

Multithread

3200G

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
44.42k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
67.5k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
14.6k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
8.06k (x1.23)
TOTAL
166.79k
134.58k (x0.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
21.65k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
19.18k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.38k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
8.3k (x1.52)
TOTAL
49.21k
53.51k (x1.09)

Multithread

3200G

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
77.12k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
68.68k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
15.24k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
7.78k (x1.42)
TOTAL
168.69k
168.81k (x1)

Performance/W
3200G
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
3751 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4