Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-4570
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4570 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-4570 gets 161.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-4570 gets 161.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
43.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
161.61k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.16k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
10.33k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.74k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
4.33k (x0.66)
TOTAL
33.79k
23.56k (x0.7)
Multithread
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
16.5k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
41.12k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
18.71k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
7.43k (x1.14)
TOTAL
108.01k
83.76k (x0.78)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
12.82k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
11.4k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.03k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
4.27k (x0.65)
TOTAL
48k
33.53k (x0.7)
Multithread
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
50.8k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
45.22k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
19.84k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
4.85k (x0.74)
TOTAL
165.91k
120.71k (x0.73)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
13.13k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
12.02k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
4.65k (x0.64)
TOTAL
48.63k
34.8k (x0.72)
Multithread
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
49.75k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
45.72k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
19.93k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
9.05k (x1.38)
TOTAL
166.79k
124.44k (x0.75)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
21.72k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
12.27k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.03k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
4.54k (x0.83)
TOTAL
49.21k
43.56k (x0.89)
Multithread
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
85.75k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
48.71k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
20.08k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
7.07k (x1.29)
TOTAL
168.69k
161.61k (x0.96)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1021 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
580 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
239 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
1924 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
3408 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1398 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1261 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
12101 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4