| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-4460


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4460 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-4460 gets 140.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
39.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
140.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
12.12k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
10.69k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.71k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
3.87k (x0.53)
TOTAL
48.63k
31.39k (x0.65)

Multithread

3200G

i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
45.75k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
42.71k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
17.81k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
6.08k (x0.93)
TOTAL
166.79k
112.35k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
19.84k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
10.86k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.46k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
4.39k (x0.8)
TOTAL
49.21k
39.53k (x0.8)

Multithread

3200G

i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
75.08k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
42.36k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
16.38k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.45k (x1.18)
TOTAL
168.69k
140.27k (x0.83)

Performance/W
3200G
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
894 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
504 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
195 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
1670 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5834 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
3193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
11628 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4