Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-4440
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4440 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-4440 gets 138.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-4440 gets 138.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
38.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
138.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.71k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
9.23k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.28k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
3.8k (x0.57)
TOTAL
33.79k
21.02k (x0.62)
Multithread
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
13.33k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
34.2k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
15.91k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
6.56k (x1)
TOTAL
108.01k
70k (x0.65)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
11.43k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
10.13k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
4.53k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
3.93k (x0.59)
TOTAL
48k
30.01k (x0.63)
Multithread
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
43.67k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
38.78k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
17.03k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
7.72k (x1.17)
TOTAL
165.91k
107.2k (x0.65)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
11.56k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
10.36k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.45k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
3.8k (x0.52)
TOTAL
48.63k
30.17k (x0.62)
Multithread
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
44.07k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
41.07k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
16.89k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
7.33k (x1.11)
TOTAL
166.79k
109.35k (x0.66)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
19.08k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
10.47k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.53k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
4.21k (x0.77)
TOTAL
49.21k
38.29k (x0.78)
Multithread
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
73.26k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
41.01k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
17.12k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
7.3k (x1.33)
TOTAL
168.69k
138.69k (x0.82)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
872 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
488 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
204 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
1651 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5783 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
3174 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
11604 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4