| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-3330


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 166.8 k points while the i5-3330 gets 104.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.6 times faster than the i5-3330 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306a9
Core
Picasso
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
29.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
104.78k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
10.85k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
10.47k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.21k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
4.31k (x0.59)
TOTAL
48.63k
29.84k (x0.61)

Multithread

3200G

i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
41.77k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
40.2k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
16.11k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
6.7k (x1.02)
TOTAL
166.79k
104.78k (x0.63)

Performance/W
3200G
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
796 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1350 points/W
522 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
2566 points/W
1361 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
3262 points/GHz
3390 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5719 points/GHz
3272 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
12157 points/GHz
9325 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4