Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-2500K
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 166.8 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 166.8 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
206a7
Core
Picasso
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
32.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
111.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
11.84k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
10.43k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.22k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
5.36k (x0.73)
TOTAL
48.63k
32.85k (x0.68)
Multithread
3200G
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
45.51k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
40.83k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
20.7k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
4.79k (x0.73)
TOTAL
166.79k
111.83k (x0.67)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
796 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1350 points/W
430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
218 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
2566 points/W
1177 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
3262 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5719 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
12157 points/GHz
8878 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4