Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-10600K
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-10600K gets 365.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-10600K gets 365.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0655
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
74.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
365.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
30.27k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
26.42k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
6.07k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
11.33k (x2.08)
TOTAL
49.21k
74.09k (x1.51)
Multithread
3200G
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
164.69k (x3.03)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
156.45k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
37.39k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
7.15k (x1.31)
TOTAL
168.69k
365.67k (x2.17)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1317 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1252 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
2925 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6306 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5505 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15436 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4