Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-10500H
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0652
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
378.99k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.98k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
17.92k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.81k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
12.55k (x1.9)
TOTAL
33.79k
41.26k (x1.22)
Multithread
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
29.53k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
118.16k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
38.43k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
5.29k (x0.81)
TOTAL
108.01k
191.41k (x1.77)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
15.89k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
22.74k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
6.09k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
12.49k (x1.89)
TOTAL
48k
57.21k (x1.19)
Multithread
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
96.8k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
149.1k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
39.68k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
5.28k (x0.8)
TOTAL
165.91k
290.85k (x1.75)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
15.86k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
24.07k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.94k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
11.82k (x1.62)
TOTAL
48.63k
57.69k (x1.19)
Multithread
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
97.37k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
154.42k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
38.76k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
5.4k (x0.82)
TOTAL
166.79k
295.96k (x1.77)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
27.93k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
25.41k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.91k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
12.85k (x2.35)
TOTAL
49.21k
72.1k (x1.47)
Multithread
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
176.41k (x3.24)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
158.8k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
38.53k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
5.25k (x0.96)
TOTAL
168.69k
378.99k (x2.25)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
2714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2443 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
5831 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6207 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
16023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4