Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-8100
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906eb
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
200.4k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.72k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
15.33k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.71k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
6.76k (x1.02)
TOTAL
33.79k
30.52k (x0.9)
Multithread
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
14.48k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
59.59k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
18.07k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
4.3k (x0.66)
TOTAL
108.01k
96.43k (x0.89)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.51k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
19.38k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.06k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
7.87k (x1.19)
TOTAL
48k
45.81k (x0.95)
Multithread
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
52.88k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
75.92k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
19.52k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
4.53k (x0.69)
TOTAL
165.91k
152.86k (x0.92)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
13.52k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
20.57k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.96k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
7.91k (x1.08)
TOTAL
48.63k
46.96k (x0.97)
Multithread
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
53.4k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
80.87k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
19.03k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
4.29k (x0.65)
TOTAL
166.79k
157.59k (x0.94)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
24.47k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
21.52k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.95k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
8.24k (x1.51)
TOTAL
49.21k
59.18k (x1.2)
Multithread
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
92.86k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
83.05k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
18.55k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
5.93k (x1.08)
TOTAL
168.69k
200.4k (x1.19)
Performance/W
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
3083 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
16438 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4