Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-6100U
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-6100U gets 69.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.4 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-6100U gets 69.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.4 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
406e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
69.94k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
2.27k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
9.18k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
2.97k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
3.79k (x0.57)
TOTAL
33.79k
18.21k (x0.54)
Multithread
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
4.79k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
23.04k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
7.55k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
3.86k (x0.59)
TOTAL
108.01k
39.24k (x0.36)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
7.99k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
11.82k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
2.97k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
3.75k (x0.57)
TOTAL
48k
26.52k (x0.55)
Multithread
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
15.44k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
23.79k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
6.93k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
4.03k (x0.61)
TOTAL
165.91k
50.19k (x0.3)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
8.06k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
12.85k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
3.14k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
4.01k (x0.55)
TOTAL
48.63k
28.06k (x0.58)
Multithread
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
16.58k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
28.88k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
7.38k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
3.82k (x0.58)
TOTAL
166.79k
56.66k (x0.34)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
12.55k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
12.19k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
2.81k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
3.18k (x0.58)
TOTAL
49.21k
30.73k (x0.62)
Multithread
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
29.33k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
28.81k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
6.46k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
5.33k (x0.97)
TOTAL
168.69k
69.94k (x0.41)
Performance/W
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1956 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
431 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
356 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
4663 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5459 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
13362 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4