Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-6100
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.5 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.5 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
65 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
112.28k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.81k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
15.65k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.14k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
4.28k (x0.65)
TOTAL
33.79k
28.89k (x0.85)
Multithread
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
7.75k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
37.33k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
12.13k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
3.56k (x0.54)
TOTAL
108.01k
60.77k (x0.56)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.76k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
19.96k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.44k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
4.4k (x0.67)
TOTAL
48k
43.55k (x0.91)
Multithread
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
28.99k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
45.75k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
12.72k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
3.68k (x0.56)
TOTAL
165.91k
91.14k (x0.55)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
13.78k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
21.21k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.2k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
3.73k (x0.51)
TOTAL
48.63k
43.92k (x0.9)
Multithread
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
29.02k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
49.55k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
12.3k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
3.28k (x0.5)
TOTAL
166.79k
94.15k (x0.56)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
22.89k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
21.04k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.9k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
4.01k (x0.73)
TOTAL
49.21k
52.84k (x1.07)
Multithread
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
50.05k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
47.13k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
11.38k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
3.72k (x0.68)
TOTAL
168.69k
112.28k (x0.67)
Performance/W
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4