| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-4160


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 166.8 k points while the i3-4160 gets 74 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.3 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
74k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.13k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
10.33k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.64k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
3.95k (x0.6)
TOTAL
33.79k
23.06k (x0.68)

Multithread

3200G

i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
7.46k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
26.62k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
11.46k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
6.27k (x0.96)
TOTAL
108.01k
51.81k (x0.48)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
13.02k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
12k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.91k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
4.23k (x0.58)
TOTAL
48.63k
34.16k (x0.7)

Multithread

3200G

i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
27.45k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
28.96k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
11.83k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
5.77k (x0.88)
TOTAL
166.79k
74k (x0.44)

Performance/W
3200G
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
796 points/W
508 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1350 points/W
536 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
219 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
2566 points/W
1370 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
3262 points/GHz
3616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5719 points/GHz
3334 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1363 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
TOTAL
12157 points/GHz
9488 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4