| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e8
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
58.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
210.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
22.46k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
20.45k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.75k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
10.39k (x1.9)
TOTAL
49.21k
58.05k (x1.18)

Multithread

3200G

506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
92.69k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
90.45k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
22.02k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
5.75k (x1.05)
TOTAL
168.69k
210.91k (x1.25)

Performance/W
3200G
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W