Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 4.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 4.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
870f10
Core
Picasso
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
687.5k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.39k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
16.99k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
7.74k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
24.57k (x3.71)
TOTAL
33.79k
53.69k (x1.59)
Multithread
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
48.45k (x3.22)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
230.81k (x3.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
122.82k (x6.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
54.73k (x8.37)
TOTAL
108.01k
456.8k (x4.23)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
16.59k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
24.55k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
8.55k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
26.28k (x3.98)
TOTAL
48k
75.97k (x1.58)
Multithread
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
181.33k (x3.27)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
261.01k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
126.62k (x6.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
66.64k (x10.13)
TOTAL
165.91k
635.6k (x3.83)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
16.16k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
23.75k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
9.32k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
23.17k (x3.17)
TOTAL
48.63k
72.4k (x1.49)
Multithread
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
174.73k (x3.38)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
275.63k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
125.65k (x6.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
44.17k (x6.72)
TOTAL
166.79k
620.18k (x3.72)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
16.85k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
26.03k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
9.54k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
22.55k (x4.13)
TOTAL
49.21k
74.97k (x1.52)
Multithread
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
229.41k (x4.22)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
292.81k (x3.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
128.48k (x6.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
36.8k (x6.72)
TOTAL
168.69k
687.5k (x4.08)
Performance/W
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4