| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
Both models 3200G and 2700X are based on Zen+ architecture.

Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 2.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f82
Core
Picasso
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
433.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.25k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
19.72k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.84k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
21.36k (x3.23)
TOTAL
33.79k
51.17k (x1.51)

Multithread

3200G

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
35.04k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
181.42k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
64.86k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
8.21k (x1.25)
TOTAL
108.01k
289.54k (x2.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
15.22k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
24.12k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.87k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
21k (x3.18)
TOTAL
48k
66.21k (x1.38)

Multithread

3200G

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
126.81k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
229.86k (x2.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
61.74k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
9.77k (x1.49)
TOTAL
165.91k
428.19k (x2.58)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
14.44k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
24.92k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.8k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
19.07k (x2.61)
TOTAL
48.63k
64.24k (x1.32)

Multithread

3200G

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
122.01k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
220.34k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
59.89k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
9.9k (x1.51)
TOTAL
166.79k
412.13k (x2.47)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
15.61k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
26.08k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.84k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
18.34k (x3.36)
TOTAL
49.21k
65.87k (x1.34)

Multithread

3200G

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
123.33k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
240.46k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
61.23k (x3.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
8.17k (x1.49)
TOTAL
168.69k
433.19k (x2.57)

Performance/W
3200G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4