Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f11
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
372.73k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
12.5k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
22.92k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.45k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
14.72k (x2.01)
TOTAL
48.63k
55.59k (x1.14)
Multithread
3200G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
92.51k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
144.76k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
54.43k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
22.08k (x3.36)
TOTAL
166.79k
313.78k (x1.88)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
13.72k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
22.48k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.12k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
15.44k (x2.83)
TOTAL
49.21k
56.76k (x1.15)
Multithread
3200G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
110.92k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
200.56k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
54.24k (x2.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
7.01k (x1.28)
TOTAL
168.69k
372.73k (x2.21)
Performance/W
3200G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4