| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f11
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
13.95k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
22.02k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.17k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
16.61k (x2.27)
TOTAL
48.63k
57.75k (x1.19)

Multithread

3200G

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
120.59k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
197.34k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
56.83k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
6.41k (x0.97)
TOTAL
166.79k
381.16k (x2.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
12.65k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
20.95k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.63k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
14.47k (x2.65)
TOTAL
49.21k
52.69k (x1.07)

Multithread

3200G

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
101.78k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
177.57k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
47.18k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.78k (x1.24)
TOTAL
168.69k
333.31k (x1.98)

Performance/W
3200G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4