| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.9 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f01
Core
Picasso
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
327.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
15.5k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
22.96k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
8.78k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
8.5k (x1.56)
TOTAL
49.21k
55.74k (x1.13)

Multithread

3200G

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
110.78k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
149.38k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
60.88k (x3.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.68k (x1.22)
TOTAL
168.69k
327.72k (x1.94)

Performance/W
3200G
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
21848 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4