| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 2.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
870f10
Core
Picasso
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.2k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
17.36k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
7.5k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
23.79k (x3.6)
TOTAL
33.79k
52.85k (x1.56)

Multithread

3200G

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
22.11k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
108.04k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
56.81k (x2.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
36.39k (x5.56)
TOTAL
108.01k
223.36k (x2.07)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
15.38k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
21.94k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
7.97k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
24.76k (x3.75)
TOTAL
48k
70.05k (x1.46)

Multithread

3200G

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
96.91k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
135.12k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
70.39k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
56.43k (x8.58)
TOTAL
165.91k
358.85k (x2.16)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
15.04k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
20.95k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
8.57k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
21.71k (x2.97)
TOTAL
48.63k
66.27k (x1.36)

Multithread

3200G

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
94.36k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
141.73k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
69.38k (x3.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
32.72k (x4.98)
TOTAL
166.79k
338.19k (x2.03)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
16.04k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
24.47k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
8.38k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
21.66k (x3.97)
TOTAL
49.21k
70.55k (x1.43)

Multithread

3200G

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
113.63k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
143.55k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
63.84k (x3.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
27.34k (x4.99)
TOTAL
168.69k
348.35k (x2.07)

Performance/W
3200G
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4