Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 5 3550H
Description
Both models 3200G and 3550H are based on Zen+ architecture.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f81
Core
Picasso
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
178.26k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.63k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
16.69k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.92k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
5k (x0.76)
TOTAL
33.79k
30.24k (x0.9)
Multithread
3200G
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
13.62k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
65.71k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
23.7k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
5.64k (x0.86)
TOTAL
108.01k
108.67k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
13.51k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
22.34k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.98k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
4.24k (x0.78)
TOTAL
49.21k
45.07k (x0.92)
Multithread
3200G
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
52.21k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
95.66k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
25.54k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
4.85k (x0.89)
TOTAL
168.69k
178.26k (x1.06)
Performance/W
3200G
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1492 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
730 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
5093 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
6038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
12182 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4