| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
Both models 3200G and 3500U are based on Zen+ architecture.

Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f81
Core
Picasso
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
140.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.24k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
13.16k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.41k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
3.32k (x0.5)
TOTAL
33.79k
24.12k (x0.71)

Multithread

3200G

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
12.95k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
57.84k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
21.05k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
3.51k (x0.54)
TOTAL
108.01k
95.36k (x0.88)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
11.98k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
15.85k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
4.53k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
3.29k (x0.5)
TOTAL
48k
35.65k (x0.74)

Multithread

3200G

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
48.28k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
74.19k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
23.29k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
3.47k (x0.53)
TOTAL
165.91k
149.23k (x0.9)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
11.1k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
18.97k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
3.9k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
3.39k (x0.46)
TOTAL
48.63k
37.37k (x0.77)

Multithread

3200G

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
45.74k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
75.47k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
21.89k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
3.49k (x0.53)
TOTAL
166.79k
146.6k (x0.88)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
10.88k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
18.09k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.29k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
3.36k (x0.62)
TOTAL
49.21k
36.64k (x0.74)

Multithread

3200G

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
42.44k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
73.82k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
20.76k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
3.96k (x0.72)
TOTAL
168.69k
140.97k (x0.84)

Performance/W
3200G
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
9398 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4