| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 5 2600X


Description
Both models 3200G and 2600X are based on Zen+ architecture.

Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600X is 2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f82
Core
Picasso
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
333.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
15.75k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
26.29k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.91k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
18.48k (x3.39)
TOTAL
49.21k
66.44k (x1.35)

Multithread

3200G

2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
94.49k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
182.53k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
45.95k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
10.15k (x1.85)
TOTAL
168.69k
333.12k (x1.97)

Performance/W
3200G
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
3507 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4