| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600X is 1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f11
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.95k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
18.36k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.39k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
17.35k (x2.62)
TOTAL
33.79k
45.06k (x1.33)

Multithread

3200G

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
19.47k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
77.19k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
15.4k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
12.25k (x1.87)
TOTAL
108.01k
124.3k (x1.15)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
14.63k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
24.09k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.51k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
15.86k (x2.91)
TOTAL
49.21k
60.09k (x1.22)

Multithread

3200G

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
48.75k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
80.1k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
24.5k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
19.85k (x3.63)
TOTAL
168.69k
173.2k (x1.03)

Performance/W
3200G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4