| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX 4100


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4100 is based on Bulldozer.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 166.8 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 3.8 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
600f12
Core
Picasso
Zambezi
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
22.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
44.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
7.65k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
6.9k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
2.88k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
4.75k (x0.65)
TOTAL
48.63k
22.18k (x0.46)

Multithread

3200G

4100
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
15.53k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
15.13k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
7.98k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
5.67k (x0.86)
TOTAL
166.79k
44.31k (x0.27)

Performance/W
3200G
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
796 points/W
163 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1350 points/W
159 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
60 points/W
TOTAL
2566 points/W
466 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3262 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5719 points/GHz
1815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
758 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
TOTAL
12157 points/GHz
5836 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4