Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-1135G7
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 262.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 262.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806c1
Core
Picasso
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
69.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
262.07k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.77k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
17.26k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
9.24k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
8.39k (x1.27)
TOTAL
33.79k
38.66k (x1.14)
Multithread
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
16.86k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
76.62k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
34.56k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
4.5k (x0.69)
TOTAL
108.01k
132.53k (x1.23)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.43k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
22.29k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
11.18k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
9.75k (x1.48)
TOTAL
48k
56.64k (x1.18)
Multithread
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
40.24k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
65.99k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
28.51k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
6.66k (x1.01)
TOTAL
165.91k
141.4k (x0.85)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
15.2k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
23.46k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
11.05k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
9.53k (x1.3)
TOTAL
48.63k
59.23k (x1.22)
Multithread
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
43.69k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
70.25k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
28.48k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
6.24k (x0.95)
TOTAL
166.79k
148.66k (x0.89)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
26.46k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
23.63k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
10.24k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
9.05k (x1.66)
TOTAL
49.21k
69.38k (x1.41)
Multithread
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
105.02k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
108.51k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
36.5k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
12.04k (x2.2)
TOTAL
168.69k
262.07k (x1.55)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
3751 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
1304 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
430 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
9359 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6299 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5626 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2439 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2154 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
16518 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4