Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806c1
Core
Picasso
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
137.96k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.75k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
17.22k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
9.79k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
8.21k (x1.24)
TOTAL
33.79k
38.97k (x1.15)
Multithread
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
9.19k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
35.47k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
19.14k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
5.82k (x0.89)
TOTAL
108.01k
69.62k (x0.64)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
12.9k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
21.4k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
10.73k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
8.16k (x1.24)
TOTAL
48k
53.19k (x1.11)
Multithread
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
30.31k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
45.13k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
20.17k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
5.77k (x0.88)
TOTAL
165.91k
101.38k (x0.61)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
14.65k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
21.57k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
9.93k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
8.02k (x1.1)
TOTAL
48.63k
54.18k (x1.11)
Multithread
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
32.14k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
43.54k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
19.58k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
5.61k (x0.85)
TOTAL
166.79k
100.87k (x0.6)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
24.25k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
21.63k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
9.09k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
7.23k (x1.32)
TOTAL
49.21k
62.19k (x1.26)
Multithread
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
56.9k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
55.68k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
19.29k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.09k (x1.11)
TOTAL
168.69k
137.96k (x0.82)
Performance/W
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4