Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon X5675
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.9 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
206c2
Core
Raven Ridge
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
8.77k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
5.82k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
3.47k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
2.98k (x1.02)
TOTAL
33.14k
21.04k (x0.63)
Multithread
2200U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
53.23k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
39.35k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
27.05k (x2.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
5.28k (x1.74)
TOTAL
64.82k
124.92k (x1.93)
Performance/W
2200U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4